Exploring the use of iPads and mobile devices in education.
Planning is imperative for any technology initiative - iPad or otherwise. You need to ensure that you clearly understand and communicate how the technology integrates with your overall pedagogical objectives. Too many institutions purchase technology and then search for ways to utilize it ... or leave it collecting dust on the shelf.
Planning needs to consider both infrastructure needs and the educational applications of the new technology. Without the proper preparation, technology initiatives are liable to become expensive failures.
Campus Infrastructure Considerations
Pedagogical Considerations:
Comment
Comment by Zenith on March 6, 2011 at 6:17pm Sam,
I found your article very enlightening...considering the strong impetus the use of the iPad in the classroom is having in the school district I work for, Ysleta ISD. The article identifies all of the necessary considerations for a smooth iPad implementation. I appreciated the fact that not only did you take into account the campus infrastructure such as wireless network connectivity, but also the pedagogical considerations one should keep in mind when planning and preparing for any technological initiative. You can tell that you did your homework and thought about even the smallest things. Your blog proved to be an excellent resource which provides helpful strategies for the effective planning and implementation of the iPad.
Comment by Sam Gliksman on March 6, 2011 at 10:20am Matt, of course it's an expression of my opinion. Everything I write on the site - or for that matter anyone writes - is an expression of opinion. I do very firmly believe that experiential models are the most appropriate use of technology. One of the main advantages of technology lies in the way it can empower students to inquire, explore and discover. Does that have to be the "ideological blinder technological-driven ... dogmatism” that you quote? Firstly, it's not an approach that is technologically-driven ... it's technologically enabled. Huge difference. As I have stated numerous times, technology implementations need to flow from your pedagogical objectives and philosophy and not vice versa.
Secondly, I'd hardly call it dogmatism. You're welcome to disagree... that's why we have a forum.
Comment by Matt Ford on March 6, 2011 at 9:28am I agree with the overview provided here, and especially with the view that technology is often implemented poorly, but this part gets under my skin:
This part has nothing to do with implementation of iPads and everything to do with ones personal philosophy of education. Technology can and is used successfully in traditional classrooms. Why does technology have to be a covert way to ram a constructivist, project-based, inquiry discovery learning agenda into classrooms? Especially when such teaching has demonstrated limited evidence of success?
Larry Cuban writes:
"
By ideological I mean ideas that are political and value-driven. For example, as Judi Harris, an expert on technology integration, pointed out (see post August 27, 2010) most advocates for more technology in schools (e.g. educators, vendors, academics) are “techno-centrists” (think Seymour Papert, Nicholas Negroponte, and the latest champion of online instruction to replace teachers and schools). Techno-centrists, she says, seek “educational uses for particular technologies,” i.e., technical fixes for school problems. They have ideological blinders that lead them to celebrate the next new gadget in the name of better student learning.
The second ideological blinder technological-driven educators wear is “pedagogical dogmatism.” Most technological-inclined educators believe in their heart that these computing devices will transform undesirable teacher-centered instruction into desired student-centered classroom where teachers will be coaches, students will work on real-world projects in groups, and be self-regulated, independent learners. Constructivism–call it up-dated Dewey’s “learning by doing”–is the ideological bias built into much that passes for high-tech wisdom."
http://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2011/02/21/progress-or-regress-at-l...
Comment by Lisette Casey on March 4, 2011 at 7:04am
Comment by Andy Brovey on February 26, 2011 at 2:49pm
Comment by Cyndi Danner-Kuhn on February 25, 2011 at 10:27am
Comment by Louis Stricoff on February 25, 2011 at 9:38am
Comment by Adrian Illingworth on February 24, 2011 at 7:44pm My what comprehensive check-list that is. We are on the developer/publisher side, and it provides a great insight into the classroom/school adoption of the device.
Adrian
CEO
Cambridge English Online
Comment by Sandy Munnell on February 24, 2011 at 5:14pm Contact Sam for consulting services and professional development.
Fill out the info request form or contact Sam at
Tel: (310) 571-5904
samgliksman@gmail.com
"Education is not the filling of a pail but the lighting of a fire."
--William Butler Yeats© 2013 Created by Sam Gliksman.
You need to be a member of iPads in Education to add comments!
Join iPads in Education